From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 11:13:09 -0700 (PDT)

> 
> From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 14:43:53 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] af_unix: split 'u->readlock' into two: 'iolock' and 
> 'bindlock'
> 
> Right now we use the 'readlock' both for protecting some of the af_unix
> IO path and for making the bind be single-threaded.
> 
> The two are independent, but using the same lock makes for a nasty
> deadlock due to ordering with regards to filesystem locking.  The bind
> locking would want to nest outside the VSF pathname locking, but the IO
> locking wants to nest inside some of those same locks.
> 
> We tried to fix this earlier with commit c845acb324aa ("af_unix: Fix
> splice-bind deadlock") which moved the readlock inside the vfs locks,
> but that caused problems with overlayfs that will then call back into
> filesystem routines that take the lock in the wrong order anyway.
> 
> Splitting the locks means that we can go back to having the bind lock be
> the outermost lock, and we don't have any deadlocks with lock ordering.
> 
> Acked-by: Rainer Weikusat <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Al Viro <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

Applied.

Reply via email to