On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 14:59:28 +0300 Hadar Hen Zion <[email protected]> wrote: > > Seems we need to call tcf_hash_release regardless 'ovr': > > In case (!exist), we've created a new hash few lines above. > > Therefore in failure, don't we need a tcf_hash_release()? > > Am I missing something? > > You are right, "if (ovr)" line should be removed.
Looking at it again, seems the right condition should be (pls verify):
if (ret == ACT_P_CREATED)
tcf_hash_release(*a, bind);
Thanks,
Shmulik
