From: Oleg Drokin <gr...@linuxhacker.ru> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 17:36:44 -0400
> > On Aug 31, 2016, at 5:31 PM, David Miller wrote: > >> From: Oleg Drokin <gr...@linuxhacker.ru> >> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 23:14:06 -0400 >> >>> %ul would print an unsigned with a letter l at the end which does >>> not seem to be desired here, on the other hand the value being printed >>> is u32 so just drop the l instead of converting to %lu >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <gr...@linuxhacker.ru> >> >> %u is for unsigned values, and these are "s32" thus signed. > > Hm, you are right. > I could swear I saw them as unsigned when I looked at it. > > Anyway can they really be negative? they are seconds and usec, > should I change them to u32 too? If you're interesting in continuing with this, it is your area for exploration not our's :-)
