On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 09:41 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 09:32 -0700, Greg Rose wrote: > > I'm not sure why this hasn't been done before because it seems obvious, > > so maybe there is some reason that memcpy is used instead of > > ether_addr_copy in this code. But let's try this anyway. > > > > Change memcpy to ether_addr_copy. > > I looked at this once and gave up given the need to verify all > the possible callers that require an __aligned(2) source address. >
Ha, I figured there must be some reason for it. OK, patch withdrawn. Thanks!
