Just small comment below:
On 16-08-19 03:36 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
diff --git a/net/sched/cls_tcindex.c b/net/sched/cls_tcindex.c
index 944c8ff..d950070 100644
--- a/net/sched/cls_tcindex.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_tcindex.c
@@ -219,10 +219,10 @@ static const struct nla_policy
tcindex_policy[TCA_TCINDEX_MAX + 1] = {
[TCA_TCINDEX_CLASSID] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
};
-static void tcindex_filter_result_init(struct tcindex_filter_result *r)
+static int tcindex_filter_result_init(struct tcindex_filter_result *r)
{
memset(r, 0, sizeof(*r));
- tcf_exts_init(&r->exts, TCA_TCINDEX_ACT, TCA_TCINDEX_POLICE);
+ return tcf_exts_init(&r->exts, TCA_TCINDEX_ACT, TCA_TCINDEX_POLICE);
}
static void __tcindex_partial_destroy(struct rcu_head *head)
@@ -233,23 +233,57 @@ static void __tcindex_partial_destroy(struct rcu_head
*head)
kfree(p);
}
+static void tcindex_free_perfect_hash(struct tcindex_data *cp)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < cp->hash; i++)
+ tcf_exts_destroy(&cp->perfect[i].exts);
+ kfree(cp->perfect);
+}
+
+static int tcindex_alloc_perfect_hash(struct tcindex_data *cp)
+{
+ int i, err = 0;
+
+ cp->perfect = kcalloc(cp->hash, sizeof(struct tcindex_filter_result),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!cp->perfect)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < cp->hash; i++) {
+ err = tcf_exts_init(&cp->perfect[i].exts,
+ TCA_TCINDEX_ACT, TCA_TCINDEX_POLICE);
+ if (err < 0)
+ goto errout;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+
+errout:
+ tcindex_free_perfect_hash(cp);
+ return err;
+}
+
If you fail tcindex_alloc_perfect_hash somewhere freeing actions in
tcindex_free_perfect_hash() via tcf_exts_destroy require checking
if exts->actions require a check?
Otherwise, looks good.
Acked-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <j...@mojatatu.com>
cheers,
jamal
