Hello. On 8/22/2016 2:04 PM, Andrew Yourtchenko wrote:
Fix the flags for RA-derived routes that were saved via "ip -6 route save" and and subsequently restored via "ip -6 route restore", allowing the incoming router advertisements to update them, rather than complain about inability to do so. Upon the restore of RA-derived saved routes, set the RTF_ADDRCONF to indicate that the source of the route was originally a router advertisement, and set the RTF_DEFAULT or RTF_ROUTEINFO flag depending on prefix length. This can be considered a sister change of f0396f60d7c165018c9b203fb9b89fb224835578, inIt's enough to specify 12 digits but you also need to specify the commit summary enclosed in ("").Is just the first line of "ipv6: fix RTPROT_RA markup of RA routes w/nexthops" enough, or do I need to include the additional two
Summary means the patch subject (and the first line of the commit log).
paragraphs that follow ? (and can I keep the full hash rather than truncate down to 12 digits?)
Yes.
the other direction. Signed-off-by: Andrew Yourtchenko <[email protected]>
[...] MBR, Sergei
