On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 02:46:26PM +0100, Edward Cree wrote:
> On 10/08/16 12:14, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > Instead of printing 'expires -23sec' for expired (but not yet garbage
> > collected) routes, print 'expired 23sec' instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <p...@nwl.cc>
> > ---
> > ip/iproute.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/ip/iproute.c b/ip/iproute.c
> > index c52294d298210..a89a26d68be0f 100644
> > --- a/ip/iproute.c
> > +++ b/ip/iproute.c
> > @@ -305,6 +305,14 @@ static void print_rtax_features(FILE *fp, unsigned int
> > features)
> > fprintf(fp, " 0x%x", of);
> > }
> >
> > +static void print_expires(FILE *fp, __s32 expires, int hz)
> > +{
> > + if (expires > 0)
> > + fprintf(fp, " expires %dsec", expires/hz);
> > + else
> > + fprintf(fp, " expired %dsec", -expires/hz);
> > +}
> Perhaps something that differs by more than a single character, to
> make it stand out more? I don't know what to suggest, though.
Yes, I thought about that, too. At first, I had "expired for %dsec" for
the second case, but decided that it was a bit too verbose given that
all route info goes into a single line and is still meant to be
human-readable. :)
Cheers, Phil
