Yes, sorry about it，I am too hasty
B.R.
Jia He
On 8/8/16 7:12 PM, Florian Westphal wrote:
Jia He <[email protected]> wrote:
buff[] will be assigned later, so memset is not necessary.
Signed-off-by: Jia He <[email protected]>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexey Kuznetsov <[email protected]>
Cc: James Morris <[email protected]>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <[email protected]>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <[email protected]>
---
net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index ab3e796..43fa8d0 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -4967,7 +4967,6 @@ static inline void __snmp6_fill_stats64(u64 *stats, void
__percpu *mib,
BUG_ON(pad < 0);
- memset(buff, 0, sizeof(buff));
buff[0] = IPSTATS_MIB_MAX;
for_each_possible_cpu(c) {
for (i = 1; i < IPSTATS_MIB_MAX; i++)
buff[i] += snmp_get_cpu_field64(mib, c, i, syncpoff);
Without memset result of buff[i] += ... is undefined.
