On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 4:36 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim <j...@mojatatu.com> wrote:
> Cong,
>
> Improvement on the basic test as it no longer oopses, but:
> here's a test that will oops:
Make sure you test this together with the other patch I sent
(sorry I didn't number them), the other patch also fixed an oops.
>
> And btw, this should be submitted to -net not -net-next and should
> specify something along the lines of "broken-by .."
Oh, sure, my bad, I thought net-next is still not closed, it should
be already closed. Here it is:
Fixes: a85a970af265 ("net_sched: move tc_action into tcf_common")
Thanks!
