Baole Ni <baolex...@intel.com> writes:
> I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
> when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
> As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the
> corresponding macro,
> and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
> thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
*Scratches my head* The permissions are not 0444 below.
With 1285 patches I wonder how many typos you may have made.
Was this generated by a script?
Eric
> Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng....@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex...@intel.com>
> ---
> net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c
> b/net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c
> index a748b0c..b6c060d3 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ static inline struct ip_set_net *ip_set_pernet(struct net
> *net)
>
> static unsigned int max_sets;
>
> -module_param(max_sets, int, 0600);
> +module_param(max_sets, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR);
> MODULE_PARM_DESC(max_sets, "maximal number of sets");
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> MODULE_AUTHOR("Jozsef Kadlecsik <kad...@blackhole.kfki.hu>");
