I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the
corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng....@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex...@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/param.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/param.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/param.c
index 6d8c39a..bd6d1fb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/param.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/param.c
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
#define COPYBREAK_DEFAULT 256
unsigned int copybreak = COPYBREAK_DEFAULT;
-module_param(copybreak, uint, 0644);
+module_param(copybreak, uint, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(copybreak,
"Maximum size of packet that is copied to a new buffer on
receive");
--
2.9.2
