I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the 
corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng....@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/myricom/myri10ge/myri10ge.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/myricom/myri10ge/myri10ge.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/myricom/myri10ge/myri10ge.c
index 6d1a956..cdbad43 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/myricom/myri10ge/myri10ge.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/myricom/myri10ge/myri10ge.c
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(myri10ge_fw_name, "Firmware image name");
 static char *myri10ge_fw_names[MYRI10GE_MAX_BOARDS] =
     {[0 ... (MYRI10GE_MAX_BOARDS - 1)] = NULL };
 module_param_array_named(myri10ge_fw_names, myri10ge_fw_names, charp, NULL,
-                        0444);
+                        S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(myri10ge_fw_name, "Firmware image names per board");
 
 static int myri10ge_ecrc_enable = 1;
-- 
2.9.2

Reply via email to