From: Babu Moger <babu.mo...@oracle.com>
The array subscript increments after the execution of the statement.
So there is no issue here. However it helps to read the code better.
Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.mo...@oracle.com>
Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bow...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
index 918b94b..f2837ea 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
@@ -3084,7 +3084,7 @@ static void ixgbe_free_irq(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter)
free_irq(entry->vector, q_vector);
}
- free_irq(adapter->msix_entries[vector++].vector, adapter);
+ free_irq(adapter->msix_entries[vector].vector, adapter);
}
/**
--
2.5.5
