On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:18:47 +0200
Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> wrote:

> diff --git a/include/net/devlink.h b/include/net/devlink.h
> index c99ffe8..865ade6 100644
> --- a/include/net/devlink.h
> +++ b/include/net/devlink.h
> @@ -115,6 +115,8 @@ struct devlink *devlink_alloc(const struct devlink_ops 
> *ops, size_t priv_size);
>  int devlink_register(struct devlink *devlink, struct device *dev);
>  void devlink_unregister(struct devlink *devlink);
>  void devlink_free(struct devlink *devlink);
> +void devlink_trace_hwmsg(const struct devlink *devlink, bool incoming,
> +                      unsigned long type, const u8 *buf, size_t len);
>  int devlink_port_register(struct devlink *devlink,
>                         struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
>                         unsigned int port_index);
> @@ -154,6 +156,12 @@ static inline void devlink_free(struct devlink *devlink)
>       kfree(devlink);
>  }
>  
> +static inline void devlink_trace_hwmsg(const struct devlink *devlink,
> +                                    bool incoming, unsigned long type,
> +                                    const u8 *buf, size_t len);
> +{
> +}
> +

I'm assuming the !CONFIG_NET_DEVLINK was never tested, because the
above probably wont build, and if it did, it would be wrong.

-- Steve

Reply via email to