From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 20:41:31 -0700
> From: Jarod Wilson <ja...@redhat.com> > > I've got a bug report about an e1000e interface, where a VLAN interface is > set up on top of it: > > $ ip link add link ens1f0 name ens1f0.99 type vlan id 99 > $ ip link set ens1f0 up > $ ip link set ens1f0.99 up > $ ip addr add 192.168.99.92 dev ens1f0.99 > > At this point, I can ping another host on vlan 99, ip 192.168.99.91. > However, if I do the following: > > $ ethtool -K ens1f0 rxvlan off > > Then no traffic passes on ens1f0.99. It comes back if I toggle rxvlan on > again. I'm not sure if this is actually intended behavior, or if there's a > lack of software VLAN stripping fallback, or what, but things continue to > work if I simply don't call e1000e_vlan_strip_disable() if there are > active VLANs (plagiarizing a function from the e1000 driver here) on the > interface. > > Also slipped a related-ish fix to the kerneldoc text for > e1000e_vlan_strip_disable here... > > Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <ja...@redhat.com> > Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.br...@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com> Applied, thanks.
