Ralf Baechle wrote :
Index: linux-net.git/net/rose/af_rose.c
===================================================================
--- linux-net.git.orig/net/rose/af_rose.c 2006-04-29 01:54:21.000000000
+0100
+++ linux-net.git/net/rose/af_rose.c 2006-04-29 11:37:34.000000000 +0100
While patching af_rose.c, would you consider the following patch
ROSE/FPAC users have introduced a year ago with good success.
73 de Bernard, f6bvp
http://f6bvp.org
http://rose.fpac.free.fr/MINI-HOWTO/
http://rose.fpac.free.fr/MINI-HOWTO-FR/
--- linux/net/rose/af_rose.c.orig 2006-04-30 11:30:48.000000000 +0200
+++ linux/net/rose/af_rose.c 2006-04-30 11:27:35.000000000 +0200
@@ -753,6 +753,7 @@
rose_insert_socket(sk); /* Finish the bind */
}
+rose_try_next_neigh:
rose->dest_addr = addr->srose_addr;
rose->dest_call = addr->srose_call;
rose->rand = ((long)rose & 0xFFFF) + rose->lci;
@@ -810,6 +811,11 @@
}
if (sk->sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED) {
+ /* Try next neighbour */
+ rose->neighbour = rose_get_neigh(&addr->srose_addr, &cause, &diagnostic);
+ if (rose->neighbour)
+ goto rose_try_next_neigh;
+ /* No more neighbour */
sock->state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
return sock_error(sk); /* Always set at this point */
}
