On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:29 AM CEST, Phil Sutter <p...@nwl.cc> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:12:14AM +0200, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 06:18 PM CEST, Phil Sutter <p...@nwl.cc> wrote:
>> > This big patch was compiled by vimgrepping for memset calls and changing
>> > to C99 initializer if applicable. One notable exception is the
>> > initialization of union bpf_attr in tc/tc_bpf.c: changing it would break
>> > for older gcc versions (at least <=3.4.6).
>> >
>> > Calls to memset for struct rtattr pointer fields for parse_rtattr*()
>> > were just dropped since they are not needed.
>> >
>> > The changes here allowed the compiler to discover some unused variables,
>> > so get rid of them, too.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <p...@nwl.cc>
>> > ---
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> > diff --git a/bridge/fdb.c b/bridge/fdb.c
>> > index be849f980a802..a59d6a9c13018 100644
>> > --- a/bridge/fdb.c
>> > +++ b/bridge/fdb.c
>> > @@ -177,16 +177,15 @@ static int fdb_show(int argc, char **argv)
>> > struct nlmsghdr n;
>> > struct ifinfomsg ifm;
>> > char buf[256];
>> > - } req;
>> > + } req = {
>> > + .n.nlmsg_len = NLMSG_LENGTH(sizeof(struct ifinfomsg)),
>> > + .ifm.ifi_family = PF_BRIDGE
>> > + };
>> >
>>
>> A comma is allowed after a list of initializers (IOW, after the last
>> initializer). Having it would make for smaller/cleaner diffs in the
>> future if new structure members get added and need to be initialized.
>
> Good point! I knew about that already, but that's good reasoning why one
> would actually want to do that intentionally.
It also helps us all with the compulsive need for closure ;-)
Thanks,
Jakub
