Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote: > > I'm actually more tempted to put a BUG() in there because if any new family > > support (say AF_INET6) is added, I want to make sure I catch all the places. > > Makes sense. Do you want to do the patch yourself, or should I send > a new one doing that? > > Maybe WARN() would be better than BUG()? That would still get the attention > it needs but not kill the process.
I can stick a WARN() into your patch. David
