Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote: > gcc-6 on x86 started warning about wl3501_get_encode when building > with -O2: > > drivers/net/wireless/wl3501_cs.c: In function ‘wl3501_get_encode’: > drivers/net/wireless/wl3501_cs.c:1769:5: warning: ‘implemented’ may be used > uninitialized in this function > drivers/net/wireless/wl3501_cs.c:1686:19: warning: ‘threshold’ may be used > uninitialized in this function > drivers/net/wireless/wl3501_cs.c:1702:20: warning: ‘threshold’ may be used > uninitialized in this function > drivers/net/wireless/wl3501_cs.c:1719:23: warning: ‘txpow’ may be used > uninitialized in this function > drivers/net/wireless/wl3501_cs.c:1752:20: warning: ‘retry’ may be used > uninitialized in this function > drivers/net/wireless/wl3501_cs.c:1806:25: warning: ‘pwr_state’ may be used > uninitialized in this function > drivers/net/wireless/wl3501_cs.c:1383:24: warning: ‘value’ may be used > uninitialized in this function > > I could not figure out what exactly confuses gcc here, but splitting the > wl3501_get_mib_value function into two helps the compiler to figure out > that the variables are not actually used uninitialized, and makes it > slightly clearer to a human reader what the function actually does and > which parts of it are under the spinlock. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
Thanks, 1 patch applied to wireless-drivers-next.git: 2683f7dd9aad wl3501_cs: avoid bogus gcc-6 warning -- Sent by pwcli https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9138643/