On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 05:33:09PM -0400, Craig Gallek wrote: > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Helge Deller <del...@gmx.de> wrote: > > Any idea for a better naming than "do_sockopt_fix_sock_fprog()" ? > Thanks for catching and fixing this. I'd suggest simply leaving the > function name as-is. Your fix to the condition in that function is > sufficient to address the issue.
+1 and thanks for the fixes!
