On 21.05.2016 14:50, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> inet6_protocol's INET6_PROTO_FINAL flag denotes handler is expected not
> to request resubmission for local delivery.
> 
> For an INET6_PROTO_FINAL handler, the following actions gets executed
> prior delivery, in ip6_input_finish:
> 
>                       nf_reset(skb);
> 
>                       skb_postpull_rcsum(skb, skb_network_header(skb),
>                                          skb_network_header_len(skb));
> 
> For some reason, l2tp_ip6_protocol handler is NOT marked as
> INET6_PROTO_FINAL. Probably an oversight.
> 
> Since 'l2tp_ip6_recv' never results in a resubmission, the above actions
> are not applied to skbs passed to l2tp_ip6.
> 
> Any reason why l2tp_ip6_protocol should NOT be marked INET6_PROTO_FINAL?

I don't see any specific reason why it shouldn't be a INET6_PROTO_FINAL.
Anyway, receive path of L2TPv3 without UDP encapsulation doesn't deal
with checksums anyway, as far as I know.

> What's the consequences not executing the above actions for l2tp_ip6
> packets?

Probably not a whole lot in this case.

Bye,
Hannes

Reply via email to