On 05/17/2016 09:03 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
[...]
Someone's not gonna be happy with commit 6077776b5908 ("bpf: split
HAVE_BPF_JIT into cBPF and eBPF variant") breaking the sort order again...
Wasn't aware of that. Maybe I'm missing something, but there appears
to be no throughout consistent ordering ...
[...]
select HAVE_PERF_REGS
select HAVE_PERF_USER_STACK_DUMP
select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE
select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
select IOMMU_DMA if IOMMU_SUPPORT
select IRQ_DOMAIN
select IRQ_FORCED_THREADING
[...]
select RTC_LIB
select SPARSE_IRQ
select SYSCTL_EXCEPTION_TRACE
select HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING
select HAVE_ARM_SMCCC
[...]
