From: Mitch Williams <[email protected]>

If an untrusted VF attempts to configure promiscuous mode, log a message
pointing out its naughty behavior. But then, instead of returning an
error to the offender, just lie to it and say everything's OK. It will
continue on its way, thinking it's in promiscuous mode, but receiving no
packets except its own.

Change-ID: I63369215b1720f3c531eedfc06af86ff8c0e3dc8
Signed-off-by: Mitch Williams <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c | 10 +++++++---
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c
index 6430933..9473429 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c
@@ -1474,12 +1474,16 @@ static int i40e_vc_config_promiscuous_mode_msg(struct 
i40e_vf *vf,
 
        vsi = i40e_find_vsi_from_id(pf, info->vsi_id);
        if (!test_bit(I40E_VF_STAT_ACTIVE, &vf->vf_states) ||
-           !test_bit(I40E_VIRTCHNL_VF_CAP_PRIVILEGE, &vf->vf_caps) ||
            !i40e_vc_isvalid_vsi_id(vf, info->vsi_id)) {
+               aq_ret = I40E_ERR_PARAM;
+               goto error_param;
+       }
+       if (!test_bit(I40E_VIRTCHNL_VF_CAP_PRIVILEGE, &vf->vf_caps)) {
                dev_err(&pf->pdev->dev,
-                       "VF %d doesn't meet requirements to enter promiscuous 
mode\n",
+                       "Unprivileged VF %d is attempting to configure 
promiscuous mode\n",
                        vf->vf_id);
-               aq_ret = I40E_ERR_PARAM;
+               /* Lie to the VF on purpose. */
+               aq_ret = 0;
                goto error_param;
        }
        /* Multicast promiscuous handling*/
-- 
2.5.5

Reply via email to