Quoting Tyler Hicks (tyhi...@canonical.com):
> When checking the current cred for a capability in a specific user
> namespace, it isn't always desirable to have the LSMs audit the check.
> This patch adds a noaudit variant of ns_capable() for when those
> situations arise.
> 
> The common logic between ns_capable() and the new ns_capable_noaudit()
> is moved into a single, shared function to keep duplicated code to a
> minimum and ease maintainability.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhi...@canonical.com>

Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serge.hal...@ubuntu.com>

> ---
>  include/linux/capability.h |  5 +++++
>  kernel/capability.c        | 46 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/capability.h b/include/linux/capability.h
> index 00690ff..5f3c63d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/capability.h
> +++ b/include/linux/capability.h
> @@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ extern bool has_ns_capability_noaudit(struct task_struct 
> *t,
>                                     struct user_namespace *ns, int cap);
>  extern bool capable(int cap);
>  extern bool ns_capable(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap);
> +extern bool ns_capable_noaudit(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap);
>  #else
>  static inline bool has_capability(struct task_struct *t, int cap)
>  {
> @@ -233,6 +234,10 @@ static inline bool ns_capable(struct user_namespace *ns, 
> int cap)
>  {
>       return true;
>  }
> +static inline bool ns_capable_noaudit(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap)
> +{
> +     return true;
> +}
>  #endif /* CONFIG_MULTIUSER */
>  extern bool capable_wrt_inode_uidgid(const struct inode *inode, int cap);
>  extern bool file_ns_capable(const struct file *file, struct user_namespace 
> *ns, int cap);
> diff --git a/kernel/capability.c b/kernel/capability.c
> index 45432b5..00411c8 100644
> --- a/kernel/capability.c
> +++ b/kernel/capability.c
> @@ -361,6 +361,24 @@ bool has_capability_noaudit(struct task_struct *t, int 
> cap)
>       return has_ns_capability_noaudit(t, &init_user_ns, cap);
>  }
>  
> +static bool ns_capable_common(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap, bool audit)
> +{
> +     int capable;
> +
> +     if (unlikely(!cap_valid(cap))) {
> +             pr_crit("capable() called with invalid cap=%u\n", cap);
> +             BUG();
> +     }
> +
> +     capable = audit ? security_capable(current_cred(), ns, cap) :
> +                       security_capable_noaudit(current_cred(), ns, cap);
> +     if (capable == 0) {
> +             current->flags |= PF_SUPERPRIV;
> +             return true;
> +     }
> +     return false;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * ns_capable - Determine if the current task has a superior capability in 
> effect
>   * @ns:  The usernamespace we want the capability in
> @@ -374,19 +392,27 @@ bool has_capability_noaudit(struct task_struct *t, int 
> cap)
>   */
>  bool ns_capable(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap)
>  {
> -     if (unlikely(!cap_valid(cap))) {
> -             pr_crit("capable() called with invalid cap=%u\n", cap);
> -             BUG();
> -     }
> -
> -     if (security_capable(current_cred(), ns, cap) == 0) {
> -             current->flags |= PF_SUPERPRIV;
> -             return true;
> -     }
> -     return false;
> +     return ns_capable_common(ns, cap, true);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(ns_capable);
>  
> +/**
> + * ns_capable_noaudit - Determine if the current task has a superior 
> capability
> + * (unaudited) in effect
> + * @ns:  The usernamespace we want the capability in
> + * @cap: The capability to be tested for
> + *
> + * Return true if the current task has the given superior capability 
> currently
> + * available for use, false if not.
> + *
> + * This sets PF_SUPERPRIV on the task if the capability is available on the
> + * assumption that it's about to be used.
> + */
> +bool ns_capable_noaudit(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap)
> +{
> +     return ns_capable_common(ns, cap, false);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ns_capable_noaudit);
>  
>  /**
>   * capable - Determine if the current task has a superior capability in 
> effect
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

Reply via email to