From: Ian Campbell <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 14:21:53 +0100
> The peer may be expecting a reply having sent a request and then done a > shutdown(SHUT_WR), so tearing down the whole socket at this point seems > wrong and breaks for me with a client which does a SHUT_WR. > > Looking at other socket family's stream_recvmsg callbacks doing a shutdown > here does not seem to be the norm and removing it does not seem to have > had any adverse effects that I can see. > > I'm using Stefan's RFC virtio transport patches, I'm unsure of the impact > on the vmci transport. > > Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <[email protected]> Applied and queued up for -stable, thanks.
