On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 4:53 AM, David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: Marc Angel <m...@arista.com>
> Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 01:33:09 +0100
>
>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 9:04 PM, David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> wrote:
>>> From: Marc Angel <m...@arista.com>
>>> Date: Tue,  3 May 2016 20:30:54 +0200
>>>
>>>> @@ -1274,6 +1285,7 @@ static int macvtap_device_event(struct 
>>>> notifier_block *unused,
>>>>                               unsigned long event, void *ptr)
>>>>  {
>>>>       struct net_device *dev = netdev_notifier_info_to_dev(ptr);
>>>> +     const char *tap_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "tap%d", dev->ifindex);
>>>>       struct macvlan_dev *vlan;
>>>>       struct device *classdev;
>>>>       dev_t devt;
>>>
>>> This 'tap_name' buffer seems to be leaked in several code paths.
>>
>> Sorry about that... V3 should be better.
>
> V3 doesn't apply cleanly to net-next, please respin your patch against
> the current tree.
>
> Thanks.

I wasn't up-to-date, sorry again about that...

Thanks for being so patient.

Reply via email to