Hello,
On 20.04.2016 10:19, Alexander Aring wrote:
> This patch will introduce a 6lowpan neighbour private data. Like the
> interface private data we handle private data for generic 6lowpan and
> for link-layer specific 6lowpan.
>
> The current first use case if to save the short address for a 802.15.4
> 6lowpan neighbour.
>
> Cc: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <a...@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> include/linux/netdevice.h | 3 +--
> include/net/6lowpan.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> net/bluetooth/6lowpan.c | 2 ++
> net/ieee802154/6lowpan/core.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index 166402a..0052c42 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -1487,8 +1487,7 @@ enum netdev_priv_flags {
> * @perm_addr: Permanent hw address
> * @addr_assign_type: Hw address assignment type
> * @addr_len: Hardware address length
> - * @neigh_priv_len; Used in neigh_alloc(),
> - * initialized only in atm/clip.c
> + * @neigh_priv_len; Used in neigh_alloc()
> * @dev_id: Used to differentiate devices that share
> * the same link layer address
> * @dev_port: Used to differentiate devices that share
> diff --git a/include/net/6lowpan.h b/include/net/6lowpan.h
> index da84cf9..61c6517 100644
> --- a/include/net/6lowpan.h
> +++ b/include/net/6lowpan.h
> @@ -98,6 +98,9 @@ static inline bool lowpan_is_iphc(u8 dispatch)
> #define LOWPAN_PRIV_SIZE(llpriv_size) \
> (sizeof(struct lowpan_dev) + llpriv_size)
>
> +#define LOWPAN_NEIGH_PRIV_SIZE(llneigh_priv_size) \
> + (sizeof(struct lowpan_neigh) + llneigh_priv_size)
> +
> enum lowpan_lltypes {
> LOWPAN_LLTYPE_BTLE,
> LOWPAN_LLTYPE_IEEE802154,
> @@ -141,6 +144,27 @@ struct lowpan_dev {
> u8 priv[0] __aligned(sizeof(void *));
> };
>
> +struct lowpan_neigh {
> + /* 6LoWPAN neigh private data */
> + /* must be last */
> + u8 priv[0] __aligned(sizeof(void *));
Are you sure this declaration is correct? You take its size above, which
should result in zero. Looks a little bit strange. :)
> +};
> +
> +struct lowpan_802154_neigh {
> + __le16 short_addr;
> +};
> +
> +static inline struct lowpan_neigh *lowpan_neigh(void *neigh_priv)
> +{
> + return neigh_priv;
> +}
> +
> +static inline
> +struct lowpan_802154_neigh *lowpan_802154_neigh(void *neigh_priv)
> +{
> + return (struct lowpan_802154_neigh *)lowpan_neigh(neigh_priv)->priv;
> +}
Can't you remove lowpan_neigh completely and just use 802154_neigh at
this point?
Bye,
Hannes
