On 04/29/2016 03:49 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote: > Le 28/04/2016 18:09, Marek Vasut a écrit : >> Since commit b74766a0a0feeef5c779709cc5d109451c0d5b17 in linux-next, >> ( phylib: don't return NULL from get_phy_device() ), phy_get_device() >> will return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV) instead of NULL if the PHY device ID is >> all ones. >> >> This causes problem with stmmac driver and likely some other drivers >> which call mdiobus_register(). I triggered this bug on SoCFPGA MCVEVK >> board with linux-next 20160427 and 20160428. In case of the stmmac, if >> there is no PHY node specified in the DT for the stmmac block, the stmmac >> driver ( drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c function >> stmmac_mdio_register() ) will call mdiobus_register() , which will >> register the MDIO bus and probe for the PHY. >> >> The mdiobus_register() resp. __mdiobus_register() iterates over all of >> the addresses on the MDIO bus and calls mdiobus_scan() for each of them, >> which invokes get_phy_device(). Before the aforementioned patch, the >> mdiobus_scan() would return NULL if no PHY was found on a given address >> and mdiobus_register() would continue and try the next PHY address. Now, >> mdiobus_scan() returns ERR_PTR(-ENODEV), which is caught by the >> 'if (IS_ERR(phydev))' condition and the loop exits immediatelly if the >> PHY address does not contain PHY. >> >> Repair this by explicitly checking for the ERR_PTR(-ENODEV) and if this >> error comes around, continue with the next PHY address. >> >> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> >> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> >> Cc: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net> >> Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dingu...@opensource.altera.com> >> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com> >> Cc: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtyl...@cogentembedded.com> > > Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com> > > I had an exact same patch posted yesterday but not formally like you > did, thanks!
Ah, my google-fu must be weak tonight. Thanks! >> --- >> drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> NOTE: I don't quite like this explicit check , but I don't have better idea >> now. >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c b/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c >> index 499003ee..388f992 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c >> @@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ int __mdiobus_register(struct mii_bus *bus, struct >> module *owner) >> struct phy_device *phydev; >> >> phydev = mdiobus_scan(bus, i); >> - if (IS_ERR(phydev)) { >> + if (IS_ERR(phydev) && (PTR_ERR(phydev) != -ENODEV)) { >> err = PTR_ERR(phydev); >> goto error; >> } >> > > -- Best regards, Marek Vasut