From: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com> Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 10:39:31 -0700
> We can avoid some atomic operations on sockets not using FASYNC I guess a user can do weird things and set/clear the FASYNC bit in the middle of the SOCKWQ_ASYNC_ bit being set, and reset the FASYNC bit later and the SOCKWQ_* state is stale. However, that's probably not worth handling explicitly. Series applied, thanks.
