Hi Jason,

Overall patches look good. Just one doubt I have is below:
> 
> We use spinlock to synchronize the work list now which may cause
> unnecessary contentions. So this patch switch to use llist to remove
> this contention. Pktgen tests shows about 5% improvement:
> 
> Before:
> ~1300000 pps
> After:
> ~1370000 pps
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 52
>  +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>  drivers/vhost/vhost.h |  7 ++++---
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> index 73dd16d..0061a7b 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static int vhost_poll_wakeup(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned
> mode, int sync,
>  
>  void vhost_work_init(struct vhost_work *work, vhost_work_fn_t fn)
>  {
> -     INIT_LIST_HEAD(&work->node);
> +     clear_bit(VHOST_WORK_QUEUED, &work->flags);
>       work->fn = fn;
>       init_waitqueue_head(&work->done);
>  }
> @@ -246,15 +246,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_poll_flush);
>  
>  void vhost_work_queue(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_work *work)
>  {
> -     unsigned long flags;
> +     if (!dev->worker)
> +             return;
>  
> -     spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->work_lock, flags);
> -     if (list_empty(&work->node)) {
> -             list_add_tail(&work->node, &dev->work_list);
> -             spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->work_lock, flags);
> +     if (!test_and_set_bit(VHOST_WORK_QUEUED, &work->flags)) {
> +             /* We can only add the work to the list after we're
> +              * sure it was not in the list.
> +              */
> +             smp_mb();
> +             llist_add(&work->node, &dev->work_list);
>               wake_up_process(dev->worker);
> -     } else {
> -             spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->work_lock, flags);
>       }
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_work_queue);
> @@ -262,7 +263,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_work_queue);
>  /* A lockless hint for busy polling code to exit the loop */
>  bool vhost_has_work(struct vhost_dev *dev)
>  {
> -     return !list_empty(&dev->work_list);
> +     return !llist_empty(&dev->work_list);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_has_work);
>  
> @@ -305,7 +306,8 @@ static void vhost_vq_reset(struct vhost_dev *dev,
>  static int vhost_worker(void *data)
>  {
>       struct vhost_dev *dev = data;
> -     struct vhost_work *work = NULL;
> +     struct vhost_work *work, *work_next;
> +     struct llist_node *node;
>       mm_segment_t oldfs = get_fs();
>  
>       set_fs(USER_DS);
> @@ -315,29 +317,25 @@ static int vhost_worker(void *data)
>               /* mb paired w/ kthread_stop */
>               set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
>  
> -             spin_lock_irq(&dev->work_lock);
> -
>               if (kthread_should_stop()) {
> -                     spin_unlock_irq(&dev->work_lock);
>                       __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
>                       break;
>               }
> -             if (!list_empty(&dev->work_list)) {
> -                     work = list_first_entry(&dev->work_list,
> -                                             struct vhost_work, node);
> -                     list_del_init(&work->node);
> -             } else
> -                     work = NULL;
> -             spin_unlock_irq(&dev->work_lock);
>  
> -             if (work) {
> +             node = llist_del_all(&dev->work_list);
> +             if (!node)
> +                     schedule();
> +
> +             node = llist_reverse_order(node);

Can we avoid llist reverse here?

> +             /* make sure flag is seen after deletion */
> +             smp_wmb();
> +             llist_for_each_entry_safe(work, work_next, node, node) {
> +                     clear_bit(VHOST_WORK_QUEUED, &work->flags);
>                       __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
>                       work->fn(work);
>                       if (need_resched())
>                               schedule();
> -             } else
> -                     schedule();
> -
> +             }
>       }
>       unuse_mm(dev->mm);
>       set_fs(oldfs);
> @@ -398,9 +396,9 @@ void vhost_dev_init(struct vhost_dev *dev,
>       dev->log_file = NULL;
>       dev->memory = NULL;
>       dev->mm = NULL;
> -     spin_lock_init(&dev->work_lock);
> -     INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->work_list);
>       dev->worker = NULL;
> +     init_llist_head(&dev->work_list);
> +
>  
>       for (i = 0; i < dev->nvqs; ++i) {
>               vq = dev->vqs[i];
> @@ -566,7 +564,7 @@ void vhost_dev_cleanup(struct vhost_dev *dev, bool
> locked)
>       /* No one will access memory at this point */
>       kvfree(dev->memory);
>       dev->memory = NULL;
> -     WARN_ON(!list_empty(&dev->work_list));
> +     WARN_ON(!llist_empty(&dev->work_list));
>       if (dev->worker) {
>               kthread_stop(dev->worker);
>               dev->worker = NULL;
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> index d36d8be..6690e64 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> @@ -15,13 +15,15 @@
>  struct vhost_work;
>  typedef void (*vhost_work_fn_t)(struct vhost_work *work);
>  
> +#define VHOST_WORK_QUEUED 1
>  struct vhost_work {
> -     struct list_head          node;
> +     struct llist_node         node;
>       vhost_work_fn_t           fn;
>       wait_queue_head_t         done;
>       int                       flushing;
>       unsigned                  queue_seq;
>       unsigned                  done_seq;
> +     unsigned long             flags;
>  };
>  
>  /* Poll a file (eventfd or socket) */
> @@ -126,8 +128,7 @@ struct vhost_dev {
>       int nvqs;
>       struct file *log_file;
>       struct eventfd_ctx *log_ctx;
> -     spinlock_t work_lock;
> -     struct list_head work_list;
> +     struct llist_head work_list;
>       struct task_struct *worker;
>  };
>  
> --
> 1.8.3.1
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

Reply via email to