From: Al Viro <v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 21:07:05 +0100
> Preparation for a bunch of iov_iter stuff; I'm not sure if all of those should > go via net-next (e.g. cifs stuff almost certainly doesn't, etc.), but this > bit is common to all those series and it would be better off in your tree. > sendmsg counterpart was "get rid of the size argument of sock_sendmsg()" and > it went in more than a year ago; this one sat in my private queue since > then. Pulled, thanks Al.
