On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 11:14:54PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch> writes:
> 
> >>    mutex_lock(&ps->smi_mutex);
> >> -  ret = _mv88e6xxx_port_fdb_load(ds, port, fdb->addr, fdb->vid, state);
> >> +  if (_mv88e6xxx_port_fdb_load(ds, port, fdb->addr, fdb->vid, state))
> >> +          netdev_warn(ds->ports[port], "cannot load address\n");
> >
> > In the SF2 driver you use pr_err, but here netdev_warn. We probably
> > should be consistent if we error or warn. I would use netdev_error,
> > since if this fails we probably have a real hardware problem.
> 
> I used pr_err in the SF2 driver to be consistent with the rest of the
> code which only uses pr_err and pr_info.

O.K, good.
 
> I was thinking about adding ds_err and ds_port_err to print errors for
> ds->master_dev and ds->ports[port], but that might be overkill.

I'm also trying to kill off the use of ds within the mv88e6xxx driver.

> What do you think? Or local to the driver for the moment, like
> mvsw_err maybe?

I would keep it local. Also, for this sort of error, it does not need
to differentiate on port. It is a hardware access error, something is
wrong with the mdio bus/switch. So i would even put the message in the
very low level reg_read/reg_write functions, and no where else.

     Andrew

Reply via email to