On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 01:01 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > From: Bruce Allan <[email protected]> > > Use BUILD_BUG_ON() instead of BUG_ON() where appropriate to get a compile > error rather than crash the kernel. > > Signed-off-by: Bruce Allan <[email protected]> > Acked-by: Alexander Duyck <[email protected]> > Tested-by: Krishneil Singh <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_ethtool.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_ethtool.c > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_ethtool.c > index 28837ae..6a9f988 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_ethtool.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_ethtool.c > @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ static void fm10k_get_reg_q(struct fm10k_hw *hw, u32 > *buff, int i) > buff[idx++] = fm10k_read_reg(hw, FM10K_TX_SGLORT(i)); > buff[idx++] = fm10k_read_reg(hw, FM10K_PFVTCTL(i)); > > - BUG_ON(idx != FM10K_REGS_LEN_Q); > + BUILD_BUG_ON(idx != FM10K_REGS_LEN_Q);
idx is a variable. Does this work on all compilers? > } > > /* If function above adds more registers this define needs to be updated */ > @@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static void fm10k_get_reg_vsi(struct fm10k_hw *hw, u32 > *buff, int i) > for (j = 0; j < 32; j++) > buff[idx++] = fm10k_read_reg(hw, FM10K_RETA(i, j)); > > - BUG_ON(idx != FM10K_REGS_LEN_VSI); > + BUILD_BUG_ON(idx != FM10K_REGS_LEN_VSI); > } > > static void fm10k_get_regs(struct net_device *netdev,
