On Thu, 2016-03-31 at 18:45 -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > Eric, what's your take on Hannes's patch 2 ? > Is it more accurate to ask lockdep to check for actual lock > or lockdep can rely on owned flag? > Potentially there could be races between setting the flag and > actual lock... but that code is contained, so unlikely. > Will we find the real issues with this 'stronger' check or > just spend a ton of time adapting to new model like your other > patch for release_sock and whatever may need to come next...
More precise lockdep checks are certainly good, I only objected to 4/4 trying to work around another bug. But why do we rush for 'net' tree ? This looks net-next material to me. Locking changes are often subtle, lets take the time to do them properly.