On 14/03/16 22:59, Yuchung Cheng wrote: > OK that makes sense. > > I left some detailed comments on the actual patches. I would encourage > to submit an IETF draft to gather feedback from tcpm b/c the feature > seems portable.
Thank you for the suggestion, we appreciate the confidence. We have had in mind to eventually pursue a standardization process, but have been unsure about how a mechanism that actively introduces redundancy would be received by the IETF. It may now be the right time to propose the RDB mechanism, and we will aim to present an IEFT draft in the near future. Bendik
