On 03/17/2016 05:53 PM, Ido Schimmel wrote: > Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:25:19PM IST, and...@lunn.ch wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 04:10:31PM -0400, Murali Karicheri wrote: >>> David, >>> >>> On 08/18/2015 04:47 PM, David Miller wrote: >>>> I see some drivers where the foo_debugfs.c file is larger than the rest >>>> of the driver. Once people start using it, it's like crack, and they >>>> dump every single debugging widget they found useful at some point into >>>> there. >>>> >>>> This is not what we want. Most things I see in debugfs support was >>>> probably useful for debugging one particular bug but then it was never >>>> really useful again in the future. Those kinds of things can be done >>>> locally in someone's tree. >>>> >>>> I often see various kinds of "statistics" ending up in these things, >>>> or register dumps, both of which are 'ethtool' or similar material. >>> Very late to this discussion, but I need to port some of the internal code >>> to display the content of a ALE (Address Learning Engine) table maintained >>> in hardwareat L2 layer. Currently I have a sysfs implementation that dumps >>> information like below. >>> >>> root@k2e-evm:~# cat /sys/devices/platform/soc/2620110.netcp/ale_table >>> index 0, raw: 000007fc d000ffff ffffffff, type: addr(1), addr: >>> ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, mcstate: f(3), port mask: 1ff, no super >>> index 1, raw: 00000000 10000800 28329a1c, type: addr(1), addr: >>> 08:00:28:32:9a:1c, uctype: persistent(0), port: 0 >>> index 2, raw: 000007fc d0000100 5e000001, type: addr(1), addr: >>> 01:00:5e:00:00:01, mcstate: f(3), port mask: 1ff, no super >>> index 19, raw: 00000004 d000d4be d93db6c1, type: addr(1), addr: >>> d4:be:d9:3d:b6:c1, uctype: touched(3), port: 1 >>> >>> What is the available interface in kernel to expose this information >>> to user space as debugfs is not suggested based on this thread? >> >> This looks a lot like what the mv88e6xxx_port_fdb_dump() callback >> returns to DSA when SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_PORT_FDB is passed to >> switchdev_port_obj_dump() in the switchdev ops. > > +1 > > Also, Murali, using standard interfaces instead of debugfs will allow > you to: > > 1) Upstream your code > 2) Use existing tests for your code. In particular, the following > (which is used for mlxsw testing): > > https://github.com/jpirko/lnst/blob/master/recipes/switchdev/l2-002-bridge_fdb.py > > There are a bunch of others there which you'll probably find useful. > > BTW, are you familiar with the following document? > https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/switchdev.txt > I believe it answers your question.
Yes. I have support for DSA and switchdev for netcp driver in my TODO list. Will post more questions on this once I start work on this. Thanks Murali > > Good luck! > >> >> Andrew > -- Murali Karicheri Linux Kernel, Keystone