Hi Jiri Pirko, thanks your reviewing.
sorry, I will send a new patch according to your reviews.
On 2016/3/11 18:42, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:37:09AM CET, ouli...@huawei.com wrote:
>> The driver for Hisilicon RoCE is a platform driver.
>> The driver will support mulitple versions of hardware. Currently only "v1"
>> for hip06 SOC is supported.
>> The driver includes two parts: common driver and hardware-specific
>> operations. hns_roce_v1_hw.c and hns_roce_v1_hw.h are files for
>> hardware-specific operations only for v1 engine, and other files(.c and .h)
>> for common algorithm and common hardware operations
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lijun Ou <ouli...@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Hu(Xavier) <xavier.hu...@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Znlong <zhaonengl...@huawei.com>
>
> <snip>
>
> I'm sorry to be nitpicking, but you still have style issues in your
> code. I believe that for newly submitted code, this should be avoided. I
> already pointed that out as a comment to your last version, but you
> ignored it. So again, couple of examples:
>
>> +struct ib_ah *hns_roce_create_ah(struct ib_pd *ibpd,
>> + struct ib_ah_attr *ah_attr)
>
> <snip>
>
>> + ret = ib_get_cached_gid(ibpd->device, ah_attr->port_num,
>> + ah_attr->grh.sgid_index, &sgid, &gid_attr);
>
> <snip>
>
>> +int hns_roce_bitmap_alloc_range(
>> + struct hns_roce_bitmap *bitmap,
>> + int cnt, int align, u32 *obj)
>
> <snip>
>
>> + pages =
>> + kmalloc(sizeof(*pages) * buf->nbufs,
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>
In v2, I consider that it will violate checkpatch if write as follows
pages = kmalloc(sizeof(*pages) * buf->nbufs,
GFP_KERNEL);
so, I continue to have it.
Now, I have used kmalloc_array instead of it. I will send new patch at soon.
Again, i am sorry for my incorrect plan.
> <snip>
>
>> + dev_err(dev,
>> + "CQ alloc.Failed to find cq buf addr.\n");
>
> <snip>
>
>> + resp.qp_tab_size = hr_dev->caps.num_qps;
>
> <snip>
>
>> + buddy->bits[i] =
>> + kmalloc(s * sizeof(long), GFP_KERNEL);
>
>
> and many, many others similar to this. Please fix this.
>
>
> Also, I don't understand why you have "_" prefix for labels:
>
>> +
>> +_error_failed_register_device:
>> + hns_roce_engine_uninit(hr_dev);
>> +
>> +_error_failed_engine_init:
>> + hns_roce_cleanup_bitmap(hr_dev);
>> +
>> +_error_failed_setup_hca:
>> + hns_roce_cleanup_icm(hr_dev);
>> +
>> +_error_failed_init_icm:
>> + if (hr_dev->cmd_mod)
>> + hns_roce_cmd_use_polling(hr_dev);
>> +
>> +_error_failed_use_event:
>> + hns_roce_cleanup_eq_table(hr_dev);
>> +
>> +_error_failed_eq_tabel:
>> + hns_roce_cmd_cleanup(hr_dev);
>> +
>> +_error_failed_cmd_init:
>> + (void)hns_roce_engine_reset(hr_dev, 0);
>> +
>> +_error_failed_reset_engine:
>> + hns_roce_free_cfg(hr_dev);
>> +
>> +_error_failed_get_cfg:
>> + ib_dealloc_device(&hr_dev->ib_dev);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>
> .
>
