On Tue, 2016-03-08 at 21:18 +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote: > > Why is it called "FLAG_LINK_INTR" anyway? There doesn't seem to be > > anything "INTR" about it. > > Beats me. I can only say that I always find naming difficult... > We could ask Ben, who introduced it in:
It used to be done over USB interrupt endpoints. Regards Oliver