On Tue, 2016-03-08 at 21:18 +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> > Why is it called "FLAG_LINK_INTR" anyway? There doesn't seem to be
> > anything "INTR" about it.
> 
> Beats me.  I can only say that I always find naming difficult...
> We could ask Ben, who introduced it in:

It used to be done over USB interrupt endpoints.

        Regards
                Oliver


Reply via email to