Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Calling initcall 0xc0519498: init+0x0/0x24() > Calling initcall 0xc05194bc: init+0x0/0x74() > Calling initcall 0xc0519530: init+0x0/0x74() > Calling initcall 0xc05195a4: init+0x0/0x16() > Calling initcall 0xc05195ba: init+0x0/0x16() > Calling initcall 0xc05195d0: init+0x0/0x16() > Calling initcall 0xc05195e6: init+0x0/0x16() > Calling initcall 0xc05195fc: init+0x0/0x16() > Calling initcall 0xc0519612: init+0x0/0x16() > Calling initcall 0xc0519628: init+0x0/0x16() > Calling initcall 0xc051963e: init+0x0/0x16() > Calling initcall 0xc0519654: init+0x0/0x4a() > Calling initcall 0xc051969e: init+0x0/0x16() > Calling initcall 0xc05196b4: init+0x0/0x16() > Calling initcall 0xc05196ca: init+0x0/0x16() > Calling initcall 0xc05196e0: init+0x0/0x16() > Calling initcall 0xc05196f6: init+0x0/0x16() > Calling initcall 0xc051970c: init+0x0/0x42() > Calling initcall 0xc051974e: init+0x0/0x132() > ebt_ulog: not logging via ulog since somebody else already registered for > PF_BRIDGE > Calling initcall 0xc0519880: init_sunrpc+0x0/0x51() > Calling initcall 0xc05198d1: init_rpcsec_gss+0x0/0x3f() > Calling initcall 0xc0519910: init_kerberos_module+0x0/0x32() > Calling initcall 0xc04fde5e: amd_exit_cpu+0x0/0x11() > Calling initcall 0xc04fe43e: cyrix_exit_cpu+0x0/0x11() > Calling initcall 0xc04fe460: nsc_exit_cpu+0x0/0x11() > Calling initcall 0xc04fe6eb: centaur_exit_cpu+0x0/0x11() > > > I'd also be interested in knowing how we managed to defeat > print_fn_descriptor_symbol()..
We didn't. Those are netfilter initcalls. Netfilter likes to call every init function "init" and every exitcall "exit". It's fairly unhelpful of netfilter to have adopted that convention, for obvious reasons, plus defeating ctags. Would it be possible to do s/init/ebt_ulog_init/etc? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
