On Mon, 2006-13-03 at 18:33 -0800, Matt Helsley wrote: > On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 19:56 -0500, Shailabh Nagar wrote:
> Jamal, was your Mon, 13 Mar 2006 21:29:09 -0500 reply: > > Note, you are still not following the standard scheme of doing things. > > Example: using command = GET and the message carrying the TGID to note > > which TGID is of interest. Instead you have command = TGID. > > > meant to suggest that TASKSTATS_CMD_(P|TG)ID should be renamed to > TASKSTATS_CMD_GET_(P|TG)ID ? Is that sufficient? Or am I > misunderstanding? > I had a long description in an earlier email feedback; but the summary of it is the GET command is generic like TASKSTATS_CMD_GET; the message itself carries TLVs of what needs to be gotten which are either PID and/or TGID etc. Anyways, theres a long spill of what i am saying in that earlier email. Perhaps the current patch is a transition towards that? cheers, jamal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
