On Mon, 2006-13-03 at 18:55 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote: > jamal wrote:
> > Lets put it this way: > > The only you will _ever_ get that message is if you had made a syntax > > error (which you did not). Please look at the code on where that message > > appears and: > > > > a) tell me how you would have got that message to begin with using > > perfectly legal syntax. > > a) tell me how a memset would have fixed that. > > He already told you, pack_key expects the selector to be initialized, > otherwise nkeys might contain a value >= 128, which would cause > exactly this error, if a matching key is not found within the > uninitialized memory by accident. > oops. Yes - that is possible. > BTW, running valgrind on tc shows lots of uses of uninitialized values, > it seems like a good idea if someone would go over these and fix them > up. It will be valuable to fix so we dont run in these issues again. Russell - I will respond to the rest of the email either tonight or tomorrow. cheers, jamal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
