On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 10:56:21 -0800, Jouni Malinen wrote: > I'm at the IEEE 802.11 meeting for this week, so I'm unlikely to be able > to test any of these before next week. Anyway, I did go through the > patches quickly and in general, they looked quite good. I would like to > go through couple of tests with various combinations of different types > of interfaces to make sure that there are no corner cases that would > have problems with some of the changes.
Thanks! > As far as AP mode is concerned, I'm in process of getting something > useful merged into the open source hostapd repository, so that that mode > would be more easily available for others to test. Your changes seemed > to modify some of the used kernel-userspace commands for this area, but > I did not notice any major problems there either. I really think we should get rid of wlan%dap devices. This will be possible when all of interfaces use native 802.11 frames; additional information from kernel to hostapd can be passed via netlink. But this will probably mean large changes to hostapd. > This patchset was marked "RFC". Are you hoping to get these merged in in > more or less their current state or do you have plans on modifying these > more before requesting them to be applied? I don't plan to modify them unless there is some fundamental problem in them. But these changes are really invasive, so I wanted to hear other people's opinions first (especially from DeviceScape people :-)). Thanks, -- Jiri Benc SUSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
