From: Rick Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 17:10:59 -0800
> Didn't Jesse say something about the 2.4 stack being "ok" wrt > growing the window beyond 32767 bytes? 2.4 has had lots of exposure > right? Isn't that something of an existence proof that the issue > with older DOS TCP stacks is today a non-issue? Like I said, send me the patch that disables the 32768 limit when we see any of the TCP extensions for high performance, such as timestamps, negotiated successfully. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
