In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 27 Jan 2006 08:05:23 -0500), jamal
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> diff --git a/include/linux/xfrm.h b/include/linux/xfrm.h
> index 82fbb75..b54a129 100644
> --- a/include/linux/xfrm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/xfrm.h
:
> @@ -235,6 +258,11 @@ struct xfrm_usersa_id {
> __u8 proto;
> };
>
> +struct xfrm_aevent_id {
> + __u32 flags;
> + struct xfrm_usersa_id sa_id;
> +};
> +
> struct xfrm_userspi_info {
> struct xfrm_usersa_info info;
> __u32 min;
:
Maybe paranoid, but anyway...
Jamal, is this okay on 64/32 biarch, which means, there are no differenes
between 32bit arch and 64bit arch?
IMHO, because of alignment, it is better to swap flags and sa_id,
isn't it?
--yoshfuji
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html