Andrew Morton a écrit :
Ravikiran G Thirumalai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 09:53:53AM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Ravikiran G Thirumalai a écrit :
Change the atomic_t sockets_allocated member of struct proto to a per-cpu counter.

Signed-off-by: Pravin B. Shelar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Ravikiran Thirumalai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Shai Fultheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Hi Ravikiran

If I correctly read this patch, I think there is a scalability problem.

On a big SMP machine, read_sockets_allocated() is going to be a real killer.

Say we have 128 Opterons CPUS in a box.
read_sockets_allocated is being invoked when when /proc/net/protocols is read,
which can be assumed as not frequent. At sk_stream_mem_schedule(), read_sockets_allocated() is invoked only certain conditions, under memory pressure -- on a large CPU count machine, you'd have large memory, and I don't think read_sockets_allocated would get called often. It did not atleast on our 8cpu/16G box. So this should be OK I think.

That being said, the percpu_counters aren't a terribly successful concept
and probably do need a revisit due to the high inaccuracy at high CPU
counts.  It might be better to do some generic version of vm_acct_memory()
instead.

There are several issues here :

alloc_percpu() current implementation is a a waste of ram. (because it uses slab allocations that have a minimum size of 32 bytes)

Currently we cannot use per_cpu(&some_object, cpu), so a generic version of vm_acct_memory() would need a rework of percpu.h and maybe this is not possible on every platform ?

#define per_cpu(var, cpu) (*RELOC_HIDE(&per_cpu__##var, __per_cpu_offset[cpu]))

-->

#define per_cpu_name(var) per_cpu__##var
#define per_cpu_addr(var) &per_cpu_name(var)
#define per_cpu(var, cpu) (*RELOC_HIDE(per_cpu_addr(var), __per_cpu_offset[cpu])


But this could render TLS migration difficult...

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to