Ingo Oeser wrote:
Jeff Kirsher wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: John Ronciak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
index 44149f9..98a775b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
@@ -29,11 +29,73 @@
#include "e1000.h"
/* Change Log
Wasn't it consensus, that changelogs are better kept in version control systems
or at least
seperate from code?
In general, yes. It's not necessarily a strong reason to reject an
otherwise-OK patch.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
