On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 07:36:02PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > John W. Linville wrote: > >On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 02:27:16PM -0800, John Ronciak wrote: > > > > > >>Another thing is that removal of the driver (or disabling the config) > >>will hopefully force the issue in that people with these ARCHs will > >>use the e100 and if they have problems we can get them fixed in the > >>e100 driver. At this point nobody seems to be able to define a "real" > >>problem other than talking about it. > > Someone should send me a patch that adds eepro100 to the feature-removal > doc.
Patch below. > jeff cu Adrian <-- snip --> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- linux-2.6.15-mm4-full/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt.old 2006-01-18 08:38:57.000000000 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.15-mm4-full/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt 2006-01-18 08:39:59.000000000 +0100 @@ -164,0 +165,6 @@ +--------------------------- + +What: eepro100 network driver +When: April 2006 +Why: replaced by the e100 driver +Who: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
