There are two good reasons (exuses?) for this: First, the dbg.c code was
written well before relayfs, so for natural reasons we could not
consider it back then. Second, at least I wasn't aware of relayfs until
recently, and I am still not sure if and how much the functionalities
overlap. Now that we are aware, we will of course look into this, and
use relayfs if it is adeqate.
Regards
///jon
Andi Kleen wrote:
On Tuesday 17 January 2006 19:58, jamal wrote:
On Tue, 2006-17-01 at 19:35 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Tuesday 17 January 2006 18:41, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
TIPC got added to 2.6.16-rc1, but needs some work.
Look at some of the global symbols, from tipc.ko
Standard practice is to restrict the namespace of modules to a small
set of prefixes (like tipc_).
Also it has its own questionable reimplementation of relayfs
Andi,
What do you mean reimplementing relayfs? TIPC is by definition an IPC
implementation so there may be some crossover. Can you be more specific?
net/tipc/dbg.c
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
