Aritz Bastida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : [...] > Anyway I don't understand why shared interrupt should interfere. In > theory nothing would be done if a interface receives a irq triggered > by another. This is at the beginning of rtl8139_interrupt: > > /* shared irq? */ > if (unlikely((status & rtl8139_intr_mask) == 0)) > goto out; > > So it would just ignore the interrupt, right? But sometimes it doesn't
Afaiks, no: rtl8139_intr_mask allows RxOK and RxOverflow. > "go out", as it receives packets even if the receive interrupts are > off (as you saw in the message I printed), which shouldn't be done > when working with NAPI. I don't claim that the shared interrupt _should_ interfere but do you see a specific reason why it would hurt the 8139too driver ? -- Ueimor - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
