On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 09:30:38PM +1100, herbert wrote: > > the need to return control to dst_output. The only reason for > dst_output to exist is to handle compilers that can't optimise away > tail calls. So if we are going to rely on the compiler to do away > with tail calls (ip_dst_output <-> __ip_dst_output), then we might > as well get rid of the loop in dst_output.
Unfortunately it looks like gcc 3.3.5 at least is too dumb to optimise it away. I think we'll need a better strategy. -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
